When I run brew upgrade license-plist I get the following error.

$ brew upgrade license-plist
==> Upgrading 1 outdated package:
mono0926/license-plist/license-plist 2.0.0 -> 2.3.0
==> Upgrading mono0926/license-plist/license-plist
==> Downloading https://github.com/mono0926/LicensePlist/archive/2.3.0.tar.gz
Already downloaded: /Users/davidcorbin/Library/Caches/Homebrew/downloads/fdbb23e4cbb10e97c178e8caf0d2aff6be4d3134ecf89b892773398384ccce25--LicensePlist-2.3.0.tar.gz
==> make install PREFIX=/usr/local/Cellar/license-plist/2.3.0
Last 15 lines from /Users/davidcorbin/Library/Logs/Homebrew/license-plist/01.make:
  "_swift_weakInit", referenced from:
      _$s6APIKit7SessionC14cancelRequests4with11passingTestyxm_SbxctAA7RequestRzlF in Session.swift.o
  "_swift_weakLoadStrong", referenced from:
      _$s6APIKit7SessionC14cancelRequests4with11passingTestyxm_SbxctAA7RequestRzlFySayAA0B4Task_pGcfU_SbAaH_pXEfU_ in Session.swift.o
  "_swift_willThrow", referenced from:
      _$s10Foundation4DataV6APIKitE11inputStream8capacityACSo07NSInputE0C_SitKcfCTf4gnd_n in Data+InputStream.swift.o
      _$s6APIKit28FormURLEncodedBodyParametersVAA0dE0A2aDP11buildEntityAA07RequestdG0OyKFTW in FormURLEncodedBodyParameters.swift.o
      _$s6APIKit18JSONBodyParametersV11buildEntityAA011RequestBodyE0OyKF in JSONBodyParameters.swift.o
      _$s6APIKit18JSONBodyParametersVAA04BodyC0A2aDP11buildEntityAA07RequestdF0OyKFTW in JSONBodyParameters.swift.o
      _$s6APIKit31MultipartFormDataBodyParametersVAA0eF0A2aDP11buildEntityAA07RequesteH0OyKFTW in MultipartFormDataBodyParameters.swift.o
      _$s6APIKit31MultipartFormDataBodyParametersV4PartV5value4name8mimeType8fileName8encodingAEyp_S2SSgAKSS10FoundationE8EncodingVtKcfC in MultipartFormDataBodyParameters.swift.o
      _$s6APIKit31MultipartFormDataBodyParametersV4PartV7fileURL4name8mimeType0H4NameAE10Foundation0I0V_S2SSgAMtKcfC in MultipartFormDataBodyParameters.swift.o
      ...
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
make: *** [build] Error 1

If reporting this issue please do so at (not Homebrew/brew or Homebrew/core):
https://github.com/mono0926/homebrew-license-plist/issues

I use the current version 1.4.5.

I generate using license-plist. It does find all the use pods as it created all the .plist files e.g. Alamofire.plist.

However all these pod plist files which should include the licenses just include 404 not found.

I tried to fix it by using a github token, but this was not the issue and did not help. Any ideas?

(Yes I have a working internet connection and I can see the license file of alamofire in my browser without any problem)

I can't show license pages including apostrophe character at iPhone X simulator. it offen occurs like 'Apache License' pages, it includes the sentences "Don't".

The same configuration shows list of licenses as expected for iOS 12, but the list is empty in iOS 13 Beta 5.

After a couple of experiments I found that items on the second level of Settings.bundle appear only if they are "wrapped" into PSGroupSpecifier.

So beginning of the com.mono0926.LicensePlist should look like:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
<plist version="1.0">
<dict>
	<key>PreferenceSpecifiers</key>
	<array>
		<dict>
			<key>Type</key>
			<string>PSGroupSpecifier</string>
			<key>Title</key>
			<string></string>
			<key>Footer</key>
			<string></string>
		</dict>
		<dict>
			<key>File</key>
			<string>com.mono0926.LicensePlist/Alamofire</string>
			<key>Title</key>
			<string>Alamofire</string>
			<key>Type</key>
			<string>PSChildPaneSpecifier</string>
		</dict>

When I try using CocoaPods is Setting.bundle does not the auto-generator. Moreover, in the setting screen, the list of licenses is not displayed. I used this test on swift 3 and it perfectly worked. Can you explain to me? Thanks

I get a message like below. (This message show when I tried generator plist file from a terminal)

[2018-12-26T14:16:38.060+09:00] [INFO] Start
[2018-12-26T14:16:38.076+09:00] [INFO] Pod acknowledgements found: Pods-InsightTests-acknowledgements.plist
[2018-12-26T14:16:38.076+09:00] [INFO] Pod acknowledgements found: Pods-Insight-acknowledgements.plist
[2018-12-26T14:16:38.140+09:00] [INFO] Pods License parse start
[2018-12-26T14:16:38.149+09:00] [WARNING] Not found: Cartfile.resolved -- file:///Users/t_nguyen/Workspace/insight_app_ios/.
[2018-12-26T14:16:38.150+09:00] [WARNING] Not found: Cartfile -- file:///Users/t_nguyen/Workspace/insight_app_ios/.
[2018-12-26T14:16:38.150+09:00] [INFO] Carthage License collect start
[2018-12-26T14:16:38.150+09:00] [INFO] Manual License start
[2018-12-26T14:16:38.151+09:00] [WARNING] Not found: file:///Users/t_nguyen/Workspace/insight_app_ios/Insight/Insight/Settings.bundle/com.mono0926.LicensePlist.latest_result.txt.
[2018-12-26T14:16:38.152+09:00] [INFO] Directory created: file:///Users/t_nguyen/Workspace/insight_app_ios/Insight/Insight/Settings.bundle/
[2018-12-26T14:16:38.180+09:00] [INFO] End
[2018-12-26T14:16:38.180+09:00] [INFO] ----------Result-----------
[2018-12-26T14:16:38.181+09:00] [INFO] # Missing license:
[2018-12-26T14:16:38.181+09:00] [INFO] None 🎉

Certain pod/repo names are not exactly the most readable, would it be possible to add something to the config which would allow remapping of names?

rename:
  - randomLib
    name: New Name

Or even maybe just for GitHub repos:

github:
  - sharethrough/iOS-SDK
    name: "Sharethrough"
  - mono0926/LicensePlist

(Where the latter wouldn't be changed as it doesn't have a name node)

With the new Package.resolved JSON version 2 (#174), which Apple introduce with Xcode 13.3 and Swift 5.6, I miss the correct package names. The possibility to improve the names is the rename-feature of your tool. Do you have any idea if there is a better way, to get the correct package names? An example:

// Version 1
{
  "package": "AppCenter",
  "repositoryURL": "https://github.com/microsoft/appcenter-sdk-apple.git",
  "state": {
    "branch": null,
    "revision": "b84bc8a39ff04bc8d5ae7b4d230c171c562891aa",
    "version": "4.4.1"
  }
}

// Version 2
{
  "identity" : "appcenter-sdk-apple",
  "kind" : "remoteSourceControl",
  "location" : "https://github.com/microsoft/appcenter-sdk-apple.git",
  "state" : {
    "revision" : "b84bc8a39ff04bc8d5ae7b4d230c171c562891aa",
    "version" : "4.4.1"
  }
}

Each package name is lowercase. Most package names ends with -sdk, -iOS-sdk or -apple.

Carthage dependencies have no problem being output, but with Cocoapods, I'm failing on all of my projects.

I have updated on Homebrew LicensePlist to the latest version along with on my project's Cocoapods.

I get this error when running license-plist when it's running through my Pods directory:

[2018-10-17T18:37:15.914-05:00] [INFO] Pod acknowledgements found: Pods-F-xxx-acknowledgements.plist [2018-10-17T18:37:15.914-05:00] [INFO] Pod acknowledgements found: Pods-F-xxx-acknowledgements.plist [2018-10-17T18:37:15.915-05:00] [INFO] Pod acknowledgements found: Pods-xxxExtension-acknowledgements.plist [2018-10-17T18:37:15.918-05:00] [INFO] Pods License parse start [2018-10-17T18:37:15.932-05:00] [ERROR] DecodeError.typeMismatch(expected: Dictionary, actual: , keyPath: KeyPath(["PreferenceSpecifiers"])) [2018-10-17T18:37:15.932-05:00] [ERROR] DecodeError.typeMismatch(expected: Dictionary, actual: , keyPath: KeyPath(["PreferenceSpecifiers"])) [2018-10-17T18:37:15.932-05:00] [ERROR] DecodeError.typeMismatch(expected: Dictionary, actual: , keyPath: KeyPath(["PreferenceSpecifiers"]))

I'm guessing that something must've changed in Cocoapod's code where LicensePlist isn't ready for such change.

Use SwiftPM:

• Building a command line tool using the Swift Package Manager
• Swift Package Manager (SwiftPM) で作るコマンドラインツール - Qiita

How to treat plist template?

• Embed to swift executable binary?
• Download?

When using SPM from Xcode there is no Package.swift as suggested in:

If you are using Swift Package Manager inside Xcode, you can use --package-path $PROJECT_FILE_PATH/project.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/swiftpm/Package.swift inside your Run script.

What exactly is meant by this? It should be removed imho. When using SPM from Xcode the resolved package info is stored in $PROJECT_FILE_PATH/project.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/swiftpm/Package.resolved and the package info itself in project.pbxproj

Hello there!

On older iOS versions (tried on iOS 10.3 and 12.1) Mapbox-iOS-SDK license not visible in settings. However scroll view scrolls vertically a lot as if the text is visible actually. When copy paste it to txt file and load it manually from file set in license_plist.yml it is invisible too. In iOS 13 it is displayed ok if not crashing settings app.

Perhaps there are some illegal characters in the text? Maybe texts should be preparsed escaping such a characters?

/bin/sh -c /Users/ying/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/Swift_Boilerplate-ajvvszjgkekqykaepbzzuubejepy/Build/Intermediates.noindex/Swift\\\ Boilerplate.build/Debug-iphonesimulator/Swift\\\ Boilerplate.build/Script-2E406B8E27B3AAD300C9C0AE.sh

Error: Unexpected argument 'Boilerplate/Settings.bundle'
Usage: license-plist <options>
  See 'license-plist --help' for more information.
Command PhaseScriptExecution failed with a nonzero exit code

I can't get the tool to run behind a proxy. I've installed it via brew and all other terminal commands such as curl and ping work in my environment. Does it not support environment variables such as HTTP_PROXY?

I am now using Swift Package Manager (SPM) instead of Cocoapods to add dependencies and would like to know if this library supports generating licences plist based on the SPM dependencies that I use.

I think that this library supports SPM based on going through the issues, but this is not mentioned at all in the README.md.

It would be great if the README.md could be updated with clear instructions in how to use this library with SPM. Only Cocoapods and Carthage are currently mentioned at the moment.

Is there an option for generating licenses by target? Currently, all dependencies end up in all targets:

• Target A, depends on DependencyA
• Target B, depends on DependencyB

The generated license plist will contain both DependencyA and DependencyB for both targets.